14 research outputs found
Impact Factor: outdated artefact or stepping-stone to journal certification?
Full text linkA review of Garfield's journal impact factor and its specific implementation
as the Thomson Reuters Impact Factor reveals several weaknesses in this
commonly-used indicator of journal standing. Key limitations include the
mismatch between citing and cited documents, the deceptive display of three
decimals that belies the real precision, and the absence of confidence
intervals. These are minor issues that are easily amended and should be
corrected, but more substantive improvements are needed. There are indications
that the scientific community seeks and needs better certification of journal
procedures to improve the quality of published science. Comprehensive
certification of editorial and review procedures could help ensure adequate
procedures to detect duplicate and fraudulent submissions.Comment: 25 pages, 12 figures, 6 table
Job satisfaction is more than a fruit basket, health checks and free exercise: Cross-sectional study among 10,000 wage earners
No full text
A Combined ANP, TOPSIS and MCGP Approach to Select Knowledge Transfer Strategy: A Case Study in Indonesian SMEs ERP System Implementation
No full textThe status of chain-of-custody certification in the countries of Central and South Europe
No full textAssessment of motivation and attitudes of forest industry companies toward forest certification in northwestern Russia
No full textWerkzeugverschleiß beim Bearbeiten von Furnierschichtholz aus Hevea brasiliensis (Gummibaum)
No full text
Building opportunities for small-farm agroforestry to supply domestic wood markets in developing countries
No full textThe Effects of Environment-friendly Consumption Value on Trust and Purchase Intention in Environment-Friendly Agricultural Products
No full text
